![]() But again this heavily depends on your code base. Perhaps you want this, perhaps you don't. Just one final thought: If you disallow Java and Kotlin in parallel, you effectively also disallow a slow migration from Java to Kotlin code base. It can be used almost everywhere Java is used today: for server-side. where mixing is a different kind of beast. Kotlin is concise, safe, pragmatic, and focused on interoperability with Java code. And due to the interoperability, this situation is different than for example Java and Python/C#/. If there's a major change planned to a service, it might be worth to also migrate this service.īut in the end, this very much depends on the code base and how you assess the risk of changing a service.Īs for the programming language itself, I'd say that in nearly every situation Kotlin is "the best tool" if your alternative is Java. I wouldn't convert code without necessity. With regards to existing services it really depends on the size of the services. I'd at least define that any new service should be written in Kotlin and have the whole team commit to this. I have a mixed Java/Kotlin monolith and interoperability wasn't an issue so far. a tutorial on building a splash screen with kotlin in android studio Python Backend Development with Django(Live) Android App Development with Kotlin(Live). ![]() If your build pipeline supports it, mixing Java and Kotlin in the same service isn't that problematic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |